Depletion calculations using the Monte-Carlo method for neutron transport commonly suffer from numerical instabilities due to a phenomenon known as xenon-power oscillations. Such oscillations are physical in nature and are regularly observed in real nuclear reactors; but the feedback between spatial xenon concentration and the spatial power distribution in most Monte-Carlo depletion simulations is nonphysical and creates stability issues when depletion is modeled in optically thick problems such as full-length fuel assemblies or full cores. The equilibrium xenon approach or stochastic implicit (SI) depletion schemes are commonly used to ameliorate these issues as resolving xenon-power oscillations by simply increasing the number of simulated histories is usually an intractable approach. This study extends a previously proposed constant relaxation predictor–corrector SI approach (SI-CE/LI) by considering a new scheme with constant relaxation of both the spatial nuclide density and flux (or power) distributions. The new scheme is called the SI-CE/LI-Flux-Nuclide (SI-CE/LI-FN) scheme. Combined relaxation of both the spatial nuclide and flux distributions has a synergistic effect and the proposed methodology is able to obtain stable solutions to a 700 cm tall Fluoride-salt High temperature Reactor fuel assembly problem. With properly chosen relaxation factors, performance is equal, or better, than that of single-field relaxation approaches used in SI depletion schemes. Moreover, SI approaches offer a new way to split computational effort in already computationally intense depletion calculations; therefore, the apportioning of computational effort when using SI schemes is further investigated and practical guidance is given for users of SI depletion schemes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Faulkner et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: