This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background Accurate spirometric interpretation depends on appropriate reference equations. The Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI-2012) equations are widely used internationally, but South Asian populations were sparsely represented in their derivation and their applicability in Indian adolescents remains uncertain. Methods We performed a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the multicity Air Pollution Exposure on Adolescents’ Lungs cohort. Healthy, non-smoking school-going adolescents aged 11–14 years from Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru and Mysuru underwent spirometry using standardised American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society procedures. GLI-2012 z-scores for forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ), forced vital capacity (FVC) and FEV 1 /FVC were calculated using the Asian reference category. Fit was assessed using mean z-scores and the proportion below the lower limit of normal (LLN; z<−1.645). Results Among 4175 adolescents (2148 males), mean z-scores were −2.44 (SD 1.27) for FEV 1 , −1.34 (0.93) for FVC and −0.78 (1.11) for FEV 1 /FVC, all well outside the accepted ±0.5 range for adequate fit. Overall, 74.6% were below the LLN for FEV 1 , 36.8% for FVC and 19.3% for FEV 1 /FVC, compared with the expected 5% in a well-calibrated healthy population. The leftward shift in z-score distributions was consistent across sex, city, age, height and body mass index strata. Conclusion GLI-2012 equations, as currently applied in the absence of South Asian-specific references, demonstrated substantial calibration mismatch relative to this cohort of Indian adolescents and risk major overclassification of low lung function. Population-specific validation and recalibration are needed before routine clinical or epidemiological use in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samdarshi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: