This work develops a minimal spinor and gauge structure for neutral domains in the Collective Vacuum Model (CVM). Starting from two overlapping complementary field components, the construction introduces a normalized (CP^1 S^2) spinor description with the standard (SU(2)→ SO(3)) double cover and (4π) spinorial periodicity. A central result follows from the eight nearest-neighbor directions of a BCC-like collective background. For a Hermitian oriented spinor bond coupling, the exact Fourier sum reduces in the long-wavelength limit to an isotropic (σ· k) operator. The full BCC momentum-space structure additionally contains opposite-chirality sectors associated with the (Γ) and (H) points, related by[ B( k+ Q_H)=- B( k).]These sectors provide a natural candidate for the two-state degree of freedom required in the four-component Dirac construction. A mixing term between them opens a gap and yields an effective Hamiltonian satisfying the Dirac Clifford algebra, with the standard massive Dirac dispersion recovered for appropriate parameter identification. The Pauli and Schrödinger equations then follow as standard nonrelativistic limits. The paper also develops a gauge-invariant separation between the collective-domain amplitude and the massless electromagnetic sector, discusses neutral kink-like neutrino excitations, interstitial localization states, matter-density normalization relative to the collective-domain scale, and the distinction between atomic, baryonic, and collective-vacuum length scales. A speculative finite-density continuation into the black-hole regime is treated separately. The aim is not to replace the Standard Model or general relativity, but to test whether a single economical collective-field ontology can remain internally consistent across lepton geometry, spinorial kinematics, electromagnetic neutrality, atomic quantum mechanics, compact baryonic matter, and extreme-density regimes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vytautas Gatelis (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: