This paper provides improved quantitative estimates of the wind-ruffled roughness contributions to dual co- and cross-polarized radar signals. Expanding previous approaches, 1696 RADARSAT-2 quad-polarized synthetic aperture radar (SAR) measurements, co-located with 65 in situ National Data Buoy Center (NDBC) buoy observations, are analyzed. Considering all wind conditions, the impact of breaking and near-breaking waves on dual co- and cross-polarized radar signals is robustly documented. For VV polarized measurements, the contribution of breaking waves decreased from 60% to 20% with increasing incidence angle, whereas for HH polarization and cross-polarization measurements, it can amount to about 60%-70% for all incidence angles. Building on the large analyzed data set, robust empirical dependencies between breaking waves and their impact on co- and cross-pol signals are then derived, as functions of wind speeds, incidence angles, and azimuth directions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kudryavtsev et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: