Non-consensual intimate imagery (NCII) inflicts significant harm. Currently, victim-survivors can use two mechanisms to report NCII online—as a non-consensual nudity violation or as copyright infringement. We conducted an audit study of takedown speed of NCII reported to X (formerly Twitter) of both mechanisms. We uploaded 50 AI-generated nude images and reported half under X’s “non-consensual nudity” reporting mechanism and half under its “copyright infringement” mechanism. The copyright condition resulted in successful image removal within 25 hours for all images (100% removal rate), while non-consensual nudity reports resulted in no image removal for over three weeks (0% removal rate). We stress the need for targeted legislation to regulate NCII removal online and discuss ethical considerations for auditing NCII on social platforms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiwei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: