Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
With the proliferation of software, protecting intellectual property from reverse engineering has become a paramount concern. Malicious actors who successfully decipher program logic can replicate applications, inject malicious code, and compromise user security. Code obfuscation serves as a critical defense mechanism by transforming a program’s structure to impede analysis while preserving its original functionality. This process inherently involves a trade-off between maximizing the confusion introduced (potency) and minimizing performance degradation (cost), which defines a multi-objective optimization problem. In this study, we propose MOCCO (Multi-Objective Class-based Code Obfuscation), a novel framework that leverages Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEAs) to automate and optimize the source code obfuscation process. Our primary contribution is the introduction and integration of class-based obfuscation techniques, which manipulate object-oriented constructs—an aspect often neglected by existing tools. We model obfuscation as a search for optimal solutions on a Pareto front, balancing metrics such as cyclomatic complexity, nesting level, code similarity, and execution time. We implement and compare three distinct MOEAs within our framework, including a global-update adaptation of MOEA/D. Our experimental evaluation, conducted on a set of benchmark programs, demonstrates that our approach, particularly when incorporating class-based techniques, generates code that scores substantially higher on structural-complexity (potency) proxies, with comparable or, in most cases, substantially lower performance overhead, relative to code produced by existing open-source obfuscators under comparable conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: