Approximate statistical sufficiency bounds decision loss, but exact reconstruction may require additional observations. This paper determines sharp recovery and retention laws for finite labeled binary Gaussian experiments under sensitivity-one scalar Gaussian acquisition, a deterministic finite query cap, and a precision budget holding on every execution. With fixed positive mass at the greatest source precision, the worst exact-recovery cost from reverse deficiency eta has order log⁻²(1/eta), uniformly in mixture size. Optimal retention with at most M Gaussian components has cost exp[-Theta(sqrt(M))]. The paper also distinguishes finite-bit from component retention, gives growing-memory laws, and establishes a sharp common-record alphabet law for two fixed future acquisition budgets. Theorems pair constructions with converse bounds under their stated assumptions. The observation model permits ideal real Gaussian samples and measurable decoders; practical efficiency is a separate question. The accompanying supplement contains proof details, reproducible rational decoder certificates, and Lean sources with an explicit coverage table. The manuscript is partially Lean-verified; some printed constants and extensions remain outside the formalized statements. AI assistance is disclosed in the manuscript. This is a preprint, not a claim of external peer review.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christian LeDeBlis (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: