Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Narrative review outlines therapeutic targeting of the Hippo–YAP/TAZ–TEAD axis across malignancies and fibrotic diseases, highlighting structural strategies to overcome resistance and toxicity.
The Hippo pathway and its downstream effectors Yes‐associated protein/transcriptional coactivator with PDZ‐binding motif‐TEA domain transcription factor (YAP/TAZ–TEAD) play critical roles in organ‐size control, tissue homeostasis, regeneration, and stem‐cell biology. Their aberrant activation drives malignancies, fibrosis, cardiovascular disease, and immune dysregulation. Once regarded undruggable, the YAP/TAZ–TEAD complex has become one of the most actively pursued target classes in oncology and beyond. In this review, we delineate the biological functions of the Hippo–YAP/TAZ–TEAD axis and integrate its pathway physiology with the structural basis of druggability, centered on the Ω‐loop surface pocket and the buried palmitoylation‐binding pocket (PBP) of TEAD, whose distinct geometries dictate the pharmacophoric requirements, paralog selectivity, and resistance liabilities of current agents. We then systematically compare mechanism‐guided therapeutic modalities, encompassing direct protein–protein interaction disruptors, covalent and noncovalent PBP inhibitors, proteolysis‐targeting chimeras (PROTACs), and cofactor‐interface modulators. We also analyze the upstream kinase (MST1/2, LATS1/2) modulators, direct YAP/TAZ inhibitors and degraders, and emerging gene‐, RNA‐, antibody‐, and cell‐based therapies. We critically evaluate preclinical and early clinical performance across oncology, fibrosis, immunology, and regenerative medicine, distinguishing robust proof‐of‐concept from clinically meaningful benefit. We further dissect resistance mechanisms, on‐target safety concerns, and the therapeutic‐window limitations of pan‐TEAD inhibition. Ultimately, we outline rational combination strategies, biomarker‐guided patient selection, and future directions for paralog‐selective and tissue‐restricted Hippo‐targeted therapeutics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: