Background: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a global health issue. Treatment involves multiple anti-TB drugs, and pharmacokinetic variability may lead to toxicity or ineffective treatment. Therapeutic drug monitoring may help address these challenges. This study aimed to develop a rapid method to analyze anti-TB drugs in plasma, serum, and saliva. Methods: A liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed for simultaneous quantification of anti-TB drugs in plasma, serum, and saliva. The method was validated according to European Medicines Agency and Food and Drug Administration guidelines, assessing linearity, selectivity, carry-over, accuracy, precision, dilution integrity, matrix effect, recovery, and stability. Performance was evaluated across plasma, serum, and saliva and in an external quality control program. Results: A method with a runtime of 1.7 minutes was developed to analyze 17 anti-TB drugs and 6 metabolites: ( N -desmethyl-)bedaquiline, clofazimine, delamanid, ethambutol, ethionamide, gatifloxacin, (acetyl-)isoniazid, (nor)levofloxacin, linezolid, moxifloxacin, pretomanid, protionamide, pyrazinamide, (desacetyl-)rifabutin, (desacetyl-)rifampicin, (desacetyl-)rifapentine, and tedizolid. The method demonstrated linearity, selectivity, and minimal carry-over. Accuracy and precision were within acceptable limits for all drugs and metabolites, with the largest biases observed for rifabutin (−13.5%) and rifapentine (11.6%). Most drugs were stable, although delamanid and protionamide required immediate processing. All analytes met the precision criteria (CV <15%) in serum and saliva, whereas matrix-specific calibrators were required for some analytes to achieve acceptable accuracy (bias <15%). Conclusions: This validated LC-MS/MS method allows simultaneous analysis of multiple anti-TB drugs in plasma, serum, and saliva, facilitating clinical and research applications. The method has been successfully applied in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bolhuis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: