In this note, the authors examine the amendments Sweden made to its dividend withholding tax rules following the CJEU decision in Keva and Others (Case C-39/23) that taxing comparable non-resident public law pension funds while exempting Swedish ones breached the free movement of capital. It elaborates briefly on the legal background to Keva and Others, the reasoning of the CJEU and the consequent amendments Sweden made to its withholding tax legislation, which entered into force on 1 July 2026. It further considers whether the new rules adequately address the discrimination identified by the CJEU and whether the requirement to establish comparability between Swedish and foreign public law bodies may create continuing legal uncertainty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ilieva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: