Key result
CT-detectable mitral valve calcium is linked to numerically lower immediate procedural success in PTMC.
Why the study?
Accurate morphological assessment is essential for predicting outcomes after PTMC in rheumatic mitral stenosis, and the incremental value of CT-derived mitral valve calcium scoring beyond the Wilkins score is unclear.
Does CT-derived mitral valve calcium scoring predict immediate procedural success in patients with severe rheumatic mitral stenosis undergoing percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy?
Observational (n=30)
No
Does CT-derived mitral valve calcium scoring predict immediate procedural success in patients with severe rheumatic mitral stenosis undergoing percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy?
CT-derived mitral valve calcium scoring may serve as a complementary anatomical marker to the Wilkins score for predicting procedural success and post-procedural severe mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing PTMC.
CT mitral calcium may flag higher PTMC failure risk; leaves open its incremental value over Wilkins score.
Accurate morphological assessment is essential for predicting outcomes after percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy (PTMC) in rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS). Computed tomography (CT) allows quantitative assessment of mitral valve calcification which may influence procedural success. This study evaluated the predictive value of mitral valve calcium score (MVCS) beyond the Wilkins score for immediate PTMC outcomes. Patients with severe RMS candidates for PTMC underwent echocardiography and gated CT for Ca scoring. Procedural success was defined as mitral valve area (MVA) ≥ 1.5 cm² or ≥ 50% increase from baseline without development of significant MR, defined as moderate–severe or severe MR. Because CT-derived calcium measures showed a zero-inflated distribution, an exploratory binary analysis of detectable versus non-detectable calcium was performed. Procedural success was achieved in 18/30 patients (60.0%). Failed PTMC was associated with numerically higher Wilkins scores (9.55 ± 1.04 vs. 8.58 ± 1.00; p = 0.05), higher CT-derived mitral valve calcium scores (16.08 ± 30.99 vs. 0.76 ± 3.13; p = 0.929), and a greater burden of moderate–severe or severe post-PTMC MR (41.7% vs. 0.0%). The Wilkins score showed moderate discrimination for immediate outcome (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.51–0.93). In patients with rheumatic MS undergoing PTMC, the Wilkins score showed moderate discrimination for immediate procedural outcome, whereas CT-derived mitral valve calcium burden showed numerical but statistically inconclusive associations with procedural failure and post-procedural high-grade MR. CT calcium scoring may serve as a complementary anatomical marker in selected patients, but larger studies are needed to define its incremental value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eini et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Rheumatic mitral stenosis (n=30). Detectable CT mitral valve calcium vs. No detectable CT mitral valve calcium was evaluated on Immediate procedural success (MVA ≥ 1.5 cm² or ≥ 50% increase from baseline without significant MR) (p=0.053). In patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis undergoing PTMC, the presence of CT-detectable mitral valve calcium was associated with a numerically lower rate of immediate procedural success compared to those without detectable calcium (28.6% vs 69.6%, p=0.053).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: