Objective: Functional gait parameters of children with cerebral palsy (CP) are not systematically improved after conventional rehabilitation post-single-event multilevel surgery (SEMLS). To enhance functional outcomes in patients one year post-surgery, a new intensive rehabilitation phase called “Activ’Marche” was added to the usual protocol. This late intensive phase was expected to improve gait function and motor performance. Methods: Design: Quasi-experimental pre–post intervention study with 3-month follow-up. Setting: In-care rehabilitation center followed by home-based telerehabilitation. Participants: 23 adolescents with CP (age 12–19 years), classified as Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I-II, one year after SEMLS. Intervention: 6-week intensive rehabilitation program consisting of 4 weeks of full-time in-care rehabilitation followed by 2 weeks of home-based telerehabilitation. The program combined high-intensity interval training, muscle strengthening, and functional gait training. Main measures: Activity capacity was assessed by 6-Minute Walk test (6MWT), 10-Meter Walk test (10MWT) and Gait Deviation Index (GDI) computation using clinical gait analysis; activity performance was measured by Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) D/E score, and one week of actimetric recording, which also partially reflects participation. Quality of life was assessed by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). Results: Significant improvements were observed in the 6MWT (+13%, p = 0.008), GMFM-66 dimensions D (+6.7%, p = 0.007) and E (+8.5%, p < 0.001), and 10MWT (+14,2%, p = 0.002), with gains maintained or enhanced at follow-up. Conclusions: This new intensive rehabilitation protocol significantly improves overall motor function and walking performance in adolescents with CP following SEMLS without affecting gait quality or quality of life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayoubi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: