This article examines the institutional constraints facing neighbourhood forums in urban, unparished areas of England. Although neighbourhood planning aims to empower communities, neighbourhood forums remain non-statutory and rely on local planning authorities for support and legitimacy. Drawing on case studies in Leeds, this article applies collaborative planning theory, institutional capacity and post-political critique to assess the neighbourhood planning process and its aftermath, as well as forum–local authority relations. The research indicates that, without ongoing support, capacity developed during the plan-making process frequently evaporates after adoption. Recent policy shifts risk reinforcing these constraints unless underpinned by long-term institutional reform.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: