Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study explored the tissue-protective properties of the continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) in an experimental model of (nonischemic) diabetic kidney injury (i.e., the db/db mouse). Mice were randomly treated with placebo (n = 25), low-dosage CERA (n = 25), and high-dosage CERA (n = 25). Also studied were 25 nondiabetic db/m mice. Hematocrit was comparable in placebo and low-dosage CERA-treated mice but increased significantly with high-dosage CERA (P < 0.01 versus both). Significantly reduced expression of TGF-beta, vascular endothelial growth factor, and collagen IV was found in glomeruli and the tubulointerstitial area with CERA treatment, and these beneficial molecular effects were clearly dosage dependent (both P < 0.05 versus placebo). Similarly, CERA treatment caused a dosage-dependent increase in p-Akt, nephrin, and perlecan tissue expression (all P < 0.05 versus placebo). However, the accelerated mesangial expansion that was observed in placebo-treated db/db mice (versus db/m controls) was significantly reduced only in low-dosage CERA-treated mice (P < 0.01). Moreover, albuminuria was significantly reduced in low- but not high-dosage CERA-treated mice compared with placebo treatment (P < 0.05). In an ancillary study, phlebotomy was performed in high-dosage CERA-treated db/db mice to keep hematocrit within normal (baseline) levels. This procedure resulted in significantly (P < 0.05) less albuminuria as compared with high-dosage CERA-treated mice without phlebotomy, thus preserving the tissue-protective potential of CERA. Long-term CERA treatment has beneficial dosage-dependent effects on molecular pathways of diabetic kidney damage. Low-dosage CERA does not affect hematocrit and therefore may be a feasible method of tissue protection in this setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Menne et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: