Dating deformation is difficult, as textures and petrogenesis of deformed rocks are complex. Moreover, geochronometer categories are pursued by communities that often do not communicate. Hygrochronology dates the retrograde metasomatic/metamorphic reactions caused by aqueous fluid circulation events. Thermochronology models time-temperature histories by assuming that mineral ages can be uniquely assigned to a ‘closure temperature T c ’, the only process occurring in rocks being Fick's Law diffusion. Diffusion by definition produces a bell-shaped concentration profile. In contrast, patchy intra-grain isotope concentration profiles denounce aqueous retrogression, whose rate is orders of magnitude faster than diffusion. Petrochronology is based on opposite assumptions, as the mobility of structure-forming major cations is higher than that of radiogenic Pb, Ar, and Sr. Whenever the formation of a mineral occurs at T < T c , its apparent age dates its formation. Nanochronology analyses samples at the nanometre-scale. These analyses illuminate atomic-scale processes, e.g. open-system transport of soluble ions along self-sealing networks of nanopores. The key to dating deformation and producing correct, regional-sized (up to hundreds of kilometres) tectonic models is the realization that minerals consist of atoms, whose behaviour is only firmly constrained by nanometre-scale analyses. Thematic collection: This article is part of the Isotopic Dating of Deformation collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/isotopic-dating-of-deformation
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Igor M. Villa (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: