Purpose This study evaluated the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Persian version of the Animated Activity Questionnaire (P-AAQ) among individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).Method To assess reliability, a subset of participants completed the P-AAQ twice. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha. Convergent validity was assessed by comparing P-AAQ scores with the Physical Component Summary of the 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12 PCS), the Activities of Daily Living subscale of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score- (KOOS-ADL), the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and the Stair Climbing Test (SCT). Discriminant validity was evaluated by comparing KOA individuals to a control group. Responsiveness was measured after one month of orthotic intervention.Results The P-AAQ demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.99) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.90). Strong correlations were found between P-AAQ and KOOS-ADL (r = 0.78) and SF-12 PCS (r = 0.79). The P-AAQ effectively differentiated between KOA and healthy individuals (p < 0.001), except for the “Taking off shoe” item. After four weeks of orthotic intervention, pain scores decreased (p < 0.001), while P-AAQ scores increased (p < 0.001), suggesting that P-AAQ was responsive to change.Conclusion The P-AAQ effectively assesses activity limitations in individuals with KOA, demonstrating strong validity, reliability, and responsiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bagheripour et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: