I examine how institutional discourse in a U.S. charter dual language immersion (DLI) school constructs teacher responsibility while dismantling teacher protection. Drawing on Critical Discourse Analysis and autoethnography, I analyze institutional, interpersonal, union, and online professional texts: a family handbook, a grievance policy, parent and student complaint emails, a union response, and a corroborating Reddit thread from r/Teachers. Feminist CDA functions as a structural tool for tracing gendered affective labor, while AsianCrit operates as a sensitizing lens for interpreting a DLI context in which Chinese language and culture are institutionally valued while the Chinese immigrant teacher’s authority remains precarious. The analysis reveals a pattern in which teachers are made accountable for classroom outcomes while structural conditions remain invisible within charter school choice, where parental investment in language becomes entangled with market accountability. I contribute to scholarship by showing how unenforced protective policies relocate institutional failure onto individual teachers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gracie Jiaxin Shen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: