Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Electrochemical CO2 reduction to ethanol can couple captured carbon with low-carbon electricity, but plant economics depend simultaneously on Faradaic efficiency (FE), current density, full-cell voltage, carbon and product retention, stack durability, downstream recovery, and electricity cost. This study develops an auditable process-based techno-economic assessment for a membrane–electrode assembly CO2-to-ethanol plant using 1 kg of saleable ethanol at the plant gate as the functional unit. The reference plant produces 10.0 million kg y−1 gross ethanol and 9.5 million kg y−1 saleable product after 5% crossover. At 64.3% ethanol FE, 0.90 A cm−2, and 33.33 kWh kg−1 gross-ethanol stack electricity, Faraday-law scaling gives 13.57 MA current, 1508 m2 active area, and 3.07 V implied average cell voltage. The revised model calculates anodic O2 from total charge, excludes unvalidated O2 revenue from the reference case, and treats the EUR/kW stack cost proxy without a second current-density area multiplier. Minimum selling prices are EUR 2.514, 3.235, and 6.120 kg−1 at electricity prices of EUR 0, 0.02, and 0.10 kWh−1, respectively. Uncertainty and Sobol analyses identify stack cost, FE, crossover, current density, discount rate, and stack lifetime as the leading economic drivers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gupta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: