Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Protect the Protector Framework: Source Integrity, Source-Damaging Differentiation, and Authorship Preservation introduces a conceptual structural framework for preserving source integrity in authored cognitive architectures. The contribution is situated within Marina A. Popova’s Human-AI Cognitive Development / Third Organism architecture. It addresses a source-preservation problem that may arise when a later framework, publication, curriculum, system, or institutional structure uses selected parts of an authored architecture while weakening, obscuring, or removing the relation to its source. The framework defines and distinguishes source integrity, source-damaging extraction, source-damaging differentiation, source-preserving use, and the Evidence Gate before applying the Protect the Protector Test. The central proposition is: A later framework cannot use the damage it caused to the source as evidence that it did not come from the source. Difference created by extraction is not proof of independence. This work is presented as a conceptual, ethical, and analytical framework. It does not create a new legal right, replace copyright law, moral rights, licensing terms, academic ethics, institutional policy, publishing guidelines, or legal review. Its purpose is to support source relation, authorship continuity, structural attribution, and responsible continuation where authored cognitive architectures are cited, discussed, applied, extended, adapted, or institutionally absorbed. This record is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). The publication may be read, downloaded, shared in unmodified form, and cited with proper attribution under the selected license. Adaptation, modification, translation, derivative framework creation, repackaging, incorporation into datasets, training materials, software systems, commercial products, or other modified redistribution requires prior written permission from the author, except where permitted by applicable law. The author retains moral rights and intellectual authorship over the concepts, terminology, structure, framework, field direction, authorship boundary, and explanatory sequence presented in this work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marina A. Popova (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: