Background Incorrect inhaler technique and inadequate counseling may compromise the effectiveness of inhaled therapy. This study assessed patient-reported satisfaction with pharmacist counseling and self-reported inhaler-use practices among respondents recruited at Heraa General Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Methods A cross-sectional, single-center survey was conducted from January to March 2024. Participants completed an electronic questionnaire during face-to-face hospital recruitment. The primary outcome was patient-reported satisfaction with pharmacist counseling; secondary outcomes included reported receipt of counseling and self-reported inhaler-use practices. Bivariate associations were assessed using chi-square tests with Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery-rate adjustment, and multivariable logistic regression was used for adjusted analyses. Results A total of 300 participant records were analyzed; 118 (39.3%) were male and 182 (60.7%) were female. Overall, 167/300 (55.7%) were satisfied or very satisfied with pharmacist counseling, whereas 114/300 (38.0%) selected the questionnaire-defined correct sequence of inhaler-use steps. Most respondents reported that pharmacists did not explain why the inhaler was prescribed (182/300, 60.7%) or what to do after a missed dose (248/300, 82.7%). In adjusted analysis, receiving an explanation of inhaler use was associated with satisfaction (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 6.93, 95% CI 3.57-13.48) but not with selection of the correct sequence (aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.34-1.27). Conclusion Respondents generally reported favorable satisfaction with pharmacist counseling, but several counseling elements were frequently not received and self-reported inhaler-use practices showed important gaps. Because inhaler technique was not directly observed and the design was cross-sectional, the findings should not be interpreted as an objective assessment of inhaler competence or as evidence that counseling caused better adherence or technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fairaq et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: