Key result
Infection with the highly virulent ASFV genotype II Arm07 strain resulted in 100% mortality, with no significant differences in clinical course or gross pathology between intramuscularly inoculated and contact-infected wild boars.
Detailed clinical course and macroscopic description of highly virulent genotype II ASFV infection in wild boar may aid in early postmortem detection and disease surveillance.
) plays a key role in the maintenance and spread of the pathogen. Here we examined gross pathology of infection in wild boar with a highly virulent, hemadsorbing genotype II ASF virus (ASFV) strain. To this end, six wild boars were intramuscularly inoculated with the 10 HAD50 Arm07 ASFV strain, and 11 wild boars were allowed to come into direct contact with the inoculated animals. No animals survived the infection. Clinical course, gross pathological findings and viral genome quantification by PCR in tissues did not differ between intramuscularly inoculated or contact-infected animals. Postmortem analysis showed enlargement of liver and spleen; serosanguinous effusion in body cavities; and multiple hemorrhages in lungs, endocardium, brain, kidneys, urinary bladder, pancreas, and alimentary system. These results provide detailed insights into the gross pathology of wild boar infected with a highly virulent genotype II ASFV strain. From a didactic point of view, this detailed clinical course and macroscopic description may be essential for early postmortem detection of outbreaks in wild boar in the field and contribute to disease surveillance and prevention efforts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodríguez‐Bertos et al. (2020) studied African swine fever (n=17). ASFV Arm07 strain vs. In-contact infection was evaluated on Mortality. Infection with the highly virulent ASFV genotype II Arm07 strain resulted in 100% mortality, with no significant differences in clinical course or gross pathology between intramuscularly inoculated and contact-infected wild boars.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: