Background and Aim Xifenghuashi formula (XFHS),a traditional Chinese medicine,shows promising effects in treating diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D),but its mechanisms are unclear.This study aims to confirm XFHS's efficacy in IBS-D treatment and its influence on the gut microbiota-bile acid-farnesoid X receptor (FXR)-fibroblast growth factor19/15 (FGF19/15) axis. Experimental procedure A randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted to assess XFHS's effectiveness.In animal experiments,IBS-D rat models were induced by oral gavage of senna along with restraint stress and divided into six groups:the IBS-D group,XFHS group (administered XFHS),ANTIBIOTIC group (administered antibiotic-s),A+XFHS group (administered antibiotics and XFHS),FGF401 (a FGFR4 receptor inhibitor) group (administered FGF401),and F+XFHS group (administered FGF401 and XFHS).Human and rat fecal samples,along with rat liver and terminal ileum samples,were analyzed for bile acid concentration,16S rRNA sequencing,and western blotting. Results and Conclusion XFHS could enhance the abundance of bile salt hydrolase (BSH)-active bacteria and decrease the abundance of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs)-producing bacteria in the IBS-D patients to a certain extent,and the same trend was found in the IBS-D rats.XFHS reduced the concentration of total fecal bile acids (including primary,conjugated,and unconjugated bile acids) in IBS-D patients and rats.However,this effect was eliminated by fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (FGFR4) blockade in IBS-D rats.Furthermore,XFHS increased the protein expression of FXR and FGF15 in the terminal ileum,FGFR4 in the liver,and decreased the expression of cytochrome P450 7A1 (CYP7A1) in the liver.Overall,XFHS alleviated symptoms of IBS-D and restored the homeostasis of the gut microbiota and bile acid metabolism by regulating the gut microbiota-bile acid-FXR-FGF15-FGFR4 axis. Trial registration number (if clinical trial)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: