Objective: To retrospectively review the management of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the uterine cervix. Methods: Forty-eight patients diagnosed with AIS of the cervix between March 1990 and March 1999 were identified. Results: Mean age of patients was 35.8 years (range 17–72). Cold knife conization resulted in a 28% rate of positive margins for AIS compared with 70% for large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). Fifteen of 39 conizations (37%) had AIS with negative margins of resection. Two of the 15 (13%) were treated with hysterectomy and 1 with repeat conization; none of the surgical specimens had residual AIS. Among 12 conservatively managed patients with negative conization margins, there was one recurrence (7%) of AIS. Eighteen of the 39 conizations (46%) had margins positive for AIS; 3 (8%) were positive for adenocarcinoma and 1 was positive for adenosquamous carcinoma. Twelve of the 18 (67%) were treated with hysterectomy and 6 of the 18 (33%) with repeat conization. Two of the 12 (17%) hysterectomy specimens and 1 of the repeat conization specimens contained residual AIS; 3 hysterectomy specimens (25%) contained cervical adenocarcinoma. Conclusion: This is the largest series of patients diagnosed with AIS to date. We found a significantly lower rate of positive margins with cold knife conization than with LLETZ. Among the conservatively managed patients with negative conization margins, there was one recurrence of AIS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wendy Kuohung (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: