Industrial steam accounts for a substantial share of European industrial energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Electrification via high-temperature electrothermal storage (HTES) is becoming a valuable technology for its decarbonization. Yet whether HTES pays off in practice depends on market conditions that vary substantially across Europe. This study develops an optimization framework that co-determines HTES sizing and operation as a supplement to gas boilers, such that the gas-electricity split is determined endogenously. The model is applied to industrial steam production in Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Spain, which together account for roughly 59% of EU27 industrial steam demand. Performance is assessed through a range of technical, economic and environmental parameters. The results indicate a range of outcomes: Finland reaches complete electrification with a payback below two years and 88% CO 2 reduction compared to gas, while Germany's high electricity prices limit the HTES to cover 36% of demand with a payback approaching nine years and only 18% emission reduction. France, the Netherlands, and Spain occupy intermediate positions. Levelized cost of heat ranges from 39 €/MWh in France to 87 €/MWh in Germany. Across the studied markets, HTES most often emerges as a complement to existing gas boilers rather than a replacement, and sensitivity analysis confirms that viability is most fragile where baseline economics are tight. These findings demonstrate that the viability of HTES-based electrification is highly context-dependent, with market conditions emerging as the dominant factor shaping both economic performance and decarbonization potential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheshmedjievska et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: