Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article explores the interaction and mutual reinforcement of two sets of cultural concerns in early cold war literature and science: the anticipation of humankind's nuclear (self-) annihilation and the emergence of new forms of ecological awareness. The interrogation of anthropocentrism that was enabled by cold war post-apocalyptic fiction, I argue, helped to shape an artistic and critical concern with non-human life in the absence of the human. Considering a range of cultural materials (including 1950s science-fictions and John Calhoun's rodent experiments in the early 1960s), the article contends that the cultural engagement with non-human forms of cognition and agency created an imaginative wedge that made it possible to think what scientists have recently called the ‘anthropocene' and what might become its aftermath. I choose the term ‘post-human’ to describe this confluence of the vision of a world from which human presence has been violently removed and the attention (anticipating more recent forms of ‘posthumanism’) that was brought to non-human forms of animal and vegetative life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benjamin Kohlmann (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: