Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
// José Perea 1, 2 , Juan Luis García 3 , Jessica Pérez 3 , Daniel Rueda 2, 4 , María Arriba 2 , Yolanda Rodríguez 5 , Miguel Urioste 6, 7 , Rogelio González-Sarmiento 3 1 Surgery Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain 2 Digestive Cancer Research Group, 12 de Octubre Research Institute, Madrid, Spain 3 Department of Medicine, Molecular Medicine Unit, Biomedical Research Institute of Salamanca (IBSAL), Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology of Cancer (IBMCC), University of Salamanca, SACYL, CSIC, Salamanca, Spain 4 Molecular Biology Laboratory, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain 5 Pathology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain 6 Familial Cancer Clinical Unit, Spanish National Cancer Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain 7 Center for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain Correspondence to: José Perea, email: josepereag@hotmail.com Keywords: early-onset colorectal cancer, NOMO-1, nodal pathway, array comparative genomic hybridization, 16p13.12-p13.11 Received: December 09, 2016 Accepted: February 07, 2017 Published: February 18, 2017 ABSTRACT To characterize clinical features of a recurrent alteration in 16p13.12-p13.11 in Colorectal Cancer (CRC), mainly in Early-onset subgroup (EOCRC), and to assess the status of NOMO1 , a gene located in that region, we analyzed differential clinicopathological, familial and molecular features of CRC subsets with and without alterations in the 16p13.12-p13.11, in global and EOCRC groups. We confirmed the region by fluorescence in-situ hybridization, and Quantitative Real-Time PCR analyzed the status of NOMO1 in different age-of-onset and Microsatellite Instability (MSI)-status CRC subsets. Both age-of-onset subsets were subsequently extended to further confirm NOMO1 gene changes. 16p13.12-p13.11 alterations were observed in 23.3% of CRCs, and was detected more frequently in EOCRC (33.3%) than in late-onset CRC (16.3%). The group with deletion in 16p showed a higher frequency of females and left-colon locations; a better prognosis; and higher Chromosomal Instability. Within the primary EOCRC population, 34 out of 34 of tumours showed a homozygous deletion in NOMO1 , while in the late-onset population only 2 of the 17 tumours (11.7%) showed it. In the extended group, we found 61 out of 75 EOCRC patients (81.3%) with homozygous deletion and 7 patients (9.3%) with heterozygous deletion of NOMO1 ; moreover, in the new 50 late-onset patients, the proportions of deletions decreased. Microsatellite-Stable (MSS) EOCRC showed a very high proportion of homozygous loss of NOMO1 (54 of 59 cases, 91.5%), while the deletion was observed in only 7 out of 16 MSI cases. Deletion of NOMO1 is a molecular marker predominantly associated with EOCRC, particularly MSS subtypes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perea et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: