The metallostannylene compounds (η 5 -C 5 H 5 )(CO) 3 MSnC 6 H 3 -2,6-Mes 2 (Mes = C 6 H 2 -2,4,6-Me 3; M = Cr ( 1 ), Mo ( 2 ), W ( 3 )), (η 5 -C 5 H 5 )(CO) 3 MSnC 6 H 3 -2,6-Trip 2 (Trip = C 6 H 2 -2,4,6-Pr i 3; M = Cr ( 4 ), Mo ( 5 ), W ( 6 )), and (η 5 -1,3-Bu t C 6 H 3 )MoSnC 6 H 2 -2,6-Trip 2 ( 7 ) were synthesized by the reaction of the appropriate aryltin(II) halide with the alkali-metal salt of the cyclopentadienylcarbonylmetalate. The compounds, which were isolated as purple ( 1 − 6 ) or turquoise ( 7 ) crystals, are monomeric with V-shaped two-coordinate geometries at tin. The tin−transition-metal bonds are slightly longer than the distances predicted from metallic and covalent radii or those observed in related tin(IV)−transition-metal species. The compounds were also characterized by IR and UV−vis spectroscopy as well as 1 H, 13 C, and 119 Sn NMR spectroscopy. The 119 Sn NMR spectra displayed singlet resonances whose chemical shifts were in the range 2116−2650 ppm. These shifts were consistent with the two-coordination at tin. With use of 119 Sn NMR and UV−visible spectroscopic data for 1 − 7, together with data for other two-coordinate tin(II) species, it was shown that there is a rough correlation between the 119 Sn NMR chemical shift and the wavelength of the n−p transition. This correlation underlines the importance of the paramagnetic shielding term in determining 119 Sn chemical shifts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eichler et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: