Key result
Multiplane TEE adds new diagnostic data in ~10% of mitral prosthesis evaluations over biplane imaging.
Why the study?
The incremental diagnostic value of multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography over exclusive biplane imaging in mitral prostheses assessment was not established.
Does multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography improve diagnostic yield compared to biplane imaging in patients with mitral prostheses?
Observational (n=73)
Does multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography improve diagnostic yield compared to biplane imaging in patients with mitral prostheses?
Multiplane transesophageal echocardiography provides new or complementary diagnostic information in over 20% of patients with mitral prostheses compared to biplane imaging alone.
May improve diagnostic yield in mitral prosthesis evaluation; leaves open whether routine multiplane use improves outcomes over biplane imaging.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how often multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography yields new or complementary data in mitral prostheses in comparison with the exclusive use of biplane imaging. PATIENTS: 73 consecutive patients with mitral prostheses who underwent multiplane transoesophageal echocardiograpy between January 1993 and December 1994. METHODS: Biplane images (transverse and longitudinal planes) and multiplane images (transverse, longitudinal, and intermediate planes) were recorded on two separate videotapes. The data provided by multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography were evaluated as (a) new data (abnormalities missed by biplane imaging); (b) complementary data (better delineating lesions already visualised by biplane imaging); or (c) redundant data (data already provided by biplane imaging). RESULTS: Multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography revealed new abnormalities in seven patients (9.5%) (thrombi in three and paraprosthetic leaks in the remaining four) and complementary data in nine (12.3%). In patients with paraprosthetic regurgitation, the possibility of continuously visualising the sewing ring by means of sequential angulations allowed the circumferential extension of the leak to be measured. In seven patients with paravalvar regurgitation who underwent surgery, the extension of the leak as measured by the multiplane approach closely corresponded with the surgical data. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with the exclusive use of biplane imaging, the multiplane approach added new or complementary data in a significant proportion of patients with mitral prostheses. The ability to obtain the sequential adjacent planes allowed a more reliable appraisal of the extension of the leak and other abnormalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Faletra et al. (1996) conducted an observational in Mitral prostheses (n=73). Multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography vs. Biplane imaging was evaluated on Yield of new or complementary data compared to biplane imaging. Multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography provided new diagnostic data in 9.5% and complementary data in 12.3% of patients with mitral prostheses compared to biplane imaging alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: