Key result
Implementation of minimally invasive esophagectomy is associated with significant learning-associated morbidity, highlighting the need for safe implementation strategies.
Highlights the importance of recognizing and mitigating learning-associated morbidity during the implementation of minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clinicians should anticipate learning-curve morbidity when adopting minimally invasive esophagectomy; review leaves open optimal mitigation and training strategies.
Surgical innovation and pioneering are important for improving patient outcome, but can be associated with learning curves. Although learning curves in surgery are a recognized problem, the impact of surgical learning curves is increasing, due to increasing complexity of innovative surgical procedures, the rapid rate at which new interventions are implemented and a decrease in relative effectiveness of new interventions compared to old interventions. For minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), there is now robust evidence that implementation can lead to significant learning associated morbidity (morbidity during a learning curve, that could have been avoided if patients were operated by surgeons that have completed the learning curve). This article provides an overview of the evidence of the impact of learning curves after implementation of MIE. In addition, caveats for implementation and available evidence regarding factors that are important for safe implementation and safe pioneering of MIE are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Workum et al. (2018) conducted a review in Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Minimally invasive esophagectomy was evaluated. Implementation of minimally invasive esophagectomy is associated with significant learning-associated morbidity, highlighting the need for safe implementation strategies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: