Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Seven different studies comprising 1,481 lightweight steers and heifers provided with 10 different vitamin E amounts (0 to 2000IU/animal daily) were compiled for a meta-analysis of the relationships between supplemental vitamin E and stressed receiving calf performance. The statistics of interest were estimated relationships between vitamin E supplementation and DMI, ADG, G:F, and percent morbidity. For the slope coefficients estimated, a whole unit change in the independent variable (X) represented a 100-IU change in vitamin E intake per day. Based on the data used to generate the estimates for these analyses, no predictive relationship exists for vitamin E supplementation and DMI, ADG, or G:F (P ≥ 0.45). However, for percent morbidity the predictive model suggests that for every 100IU increase in vitamin E intake per day, a 0.35% decrease (P = 0.08) in morbidity would be expected. The data discussed herein provides evidentiary support for vitamin E supplementation to newly received calves at high risk of morbidity. However, because the entire data set is bounded between 0 and 2,000IU/d of vitamin E intake, predictions regarding the linearity beyond 2,000IU should be avoided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
N. A. Elam (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: