OBJECTIVES: i) To evaluate objective response, toxicity, and quality of life (QoL) of gemcitabine monotherapy as second-line treatment in patients with cisplatin-refractory, metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). ii) To assess prognostic parameters for response to treatment and for improvement of QoL parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 30 patients were prospectively enrolled in this open-label, nonrandomized multicenter phase II trial. Patients received up to 6 courses of gemcitabine monotherapy (1,250 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 8 of a 21-day course). 28 of 30 patients were available for response evaluation. RESULTS: Objective response (OR) was seen in 3/28 (11%) of patients (2 complete remissions, 1 partial remission). The mean time to progression (TTP) was 4.9 +/- 3.5 months and mean disease-specific survival time was 8.7 +/- 4.7 months. 13 of 28 patients did not progress (OR + 10 stable diseases), and TTP (8.0 +/- 2.7 months, p < 0.001) as well as survival time (10.2 +/- 3.8 months, p < 0.05) differed significantly from those who showed progressive disease within 18 weeks of treatment. Pain values significantly improved in the group of responders from 4.3 +/- 1.9 to 5.8 +/- 1.3 points (p < 0.05). Response to cisplatin pretreatment was the best prognosticator for the response to gemcitabine. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine monotherapy as second-line treatment is justified in patients with metastatic TCC who are refractory to cisplatin treatment. Patients with initially OR to cisplatin benefit most from second-line treatment. QoL remains stable during treatment, and pain improves especially in patients with bone metastases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Albers et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: