Electron paramagnetic resonance/spin trapping studies were applied, to verify the superoxide radical scavenging activity of two non-toxic, water soluble dihydroquinoline type antioxidants, CH402 (Na-2,2-dimethyl-1,2-dihydroquinoline-4-yl methane sulphonate and MTDQ-DA (6,6-methylene bis 2,2-dimethyl-4-methane sulphonic acid: Na-1,2-dihydroquinoline). Results were compared with other indirect methods such as the amperometric, spectrophotometric and luminometric methods, respectively. Both dihydroquinoline type antioxidants scavenged superoxide in vitro specifically. MTDQ-DA scavenged superoxide an order of magnitude faster than CH-402. Neither CH402 nor MTDQ-DA affected the hypoxanthine/xanthine oxidase superoxide generating system, nor did they inhibit xanthine oxidase directly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prònai et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: