Improved spatial resolution without sacrificing sensitivity is one of the most challenging developmental goals for small animal PET scanners. The 3-layer configuration that we propose here utilizes relative offsets of half a crystal pitch in x- and y-directions, and pulse shape discrimination to obtain depth of interaction (DOI). Three layers of crystals with a dimension 1.5\,×\,1.5\,×\,7.0mm³were composed of a L0.2GSO (Lu0.4Gd1.6SiO₄: Ce) crystal layer and a L0.9GSO (Lu1.8Gd0.2SiO₄: Ce) crystal layer aligned with each other, and a L0.9GSO crystal layer offset at half a crystal pitch in x- and y-directions. The L0.9GSO crystal layer was attached to a Hamamatsu H9500 flat-panel PMT. The devised small animal PET scanner has a diameter of 84 mm with one detector ring, and can be upgraded to two detector rings. GEANT4 Monte-Carlo simulation was used to estimate sensitivities of~ 12%and~ 20%, respectively, at the center of one and two PMT ring system with an energy window of 350~750 keV. We present flood images with peak-to-valley ratios of about 5–6 obtained using²²Na and layer identification capability of~ 99%with pulse shape analysis, and verified the basic concepts of multi-layer small animal PET.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: