Key result
Task-switching training improved performance in both age groups, with younger adults benefiting from switching practice independently of other demands, whereas older adults showed greater and maintained transfer benefits when trained under high inhibition demands.
RCT (n=163)
Adaptive assignment based on baseline performance
No
Training in resolving interference while switching between two tasks is critical for the transfer and maintenance of cognitive benefits in older adults.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support inhibition-focused training for older adults' cognitive transfer; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective trials before any clinical adoption.
Recent aging studies on training in task switching found that older adults showed larger improvements to an untrained switching task as younger adults do. However, less clear is what type of cognitive control processes can explain these training gains as participants were trained with a particular type of switching task including bivalent stimuli, requiring high inhibition demands, and no task cues helping them keeping track of the task sequence, and by this, requiring high working-memory (WM) demands. The aims of this study were first to specify whether inhibition, WM, or switching demands are critical for the occurrence of transfer and whether this transfer depends on the degree of overlap between training and transfer situation; and second to assess whether practiced-induced gains in task switching can be maintained over a longer period of time. To this end, we created five training conditions that varied in switching (switching vs. single task training), inhibition (switching training with bivalent or univalent stimuli), and WM demands (switching training with or without task cues). We investigated 81 younger adults and 82 older adults with a pretest-training-posttest design and a follow-up measurement after 6 months. Results indicated that all training and age groups showed improvements in task switching and a differential effect of training condition on improvements to an untrained switching task in younger and older adults. For younger adults, we found larger improvements in task switching for the switching groups than the single-task training group independently of inhibition and WM demands, suggesting that practice in switching is most critical. However, these benefits disappeared after 6 months. In contrast, for older adults training groups practicing task switching under high inhibition demands showed larger improvements to untrained switching tasks than the other groups. Moreover, these benefits were maintained over time. We also found that the transfer of benefits in task switching was larger with greater overlap between training and transfer situation. However, results revealed no evidence for transfer to other untrained cognitive task. Overall, the findings suggest that training in resolving interference while switching between two tasks is most critical for the occurrence of transfer in the elderly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kray et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Cognitive Aging (n=163). Task-switching training (varying in switching, inhibition, and working-memory demands) vs. Single-task training (active control) was evaluated on Reduction in switching costs and transfer to untrained switching tasks (p=<0.001). Task-switching training improved performance in both age groups, with younger adults benefiting from switching practice independently of other demands, whereas older adults showed greater and maintained transfer benefits when trained under high inhibition demands.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: