Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The aim of the present study is to review the survival rate of dental implants with overdenture rehabilitation within the past 20 years. Patients (n = 187) treated with implant-supported overdentures from November 1993 to October 2013 were studied. Oral rehabilitations were completed and followed-up over average of 103 ± 21 months (range, 6–240 months). There were of 131 males and 56 females (mean age 64.2 years; range, 37–87 years) who received 32 dentures with 149 implants (22%) in maxillae and 161 dentures with 533 implants (78%) in mandibles. Most of the patients (n = 136) were routinely followed up every 6 months, for the others, information for data collection on implant survival was performed by telephone (n = 51). In total, 650 implants (95.3%) survived, and 32 implants (4.7%) failed. The 32 failed implants included 28 Steri-Oss implants (20.9%), one F-2 (0.8%), two Xive (1.6%), and one Nobel Biocare implant (2.3%). According to the attachment systems, eight failed implants combined with O-ring (22.9%), 11 with ball attachment (11.6%), seven with bar-clip (20.6%), one with milled-bar (0.2%), and one implant with locator (1.2%). The overall survival rate of dental implants with overdenture rehabilitation was 95.3% (91.3% in maxillae vs. 96.4% in mandibles) within the past 20 years. With careful treatment planning, implant-supported overdenture is an interesting treatment alternative with better esthetic, retention, stability, and good hygienic maintenance for patients with severe ridge resorption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: