Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Murata et al. (1996) introduced an elegant representation of block placement called sequence pair. All block-placement algorithms that are based on sequence pairs use simulated annealing where the generation and evaluation of a large number of sequence pairs is required. Therefore, a fast algorithm is needed to evaluate each generated sequence pair, i.e., to translate the sequence pair to its corresponding block placement. This paper presents a new approach to evaluate a sequence pair based on computing longest common subsequence in a pair of weighted sequences. We present a very simple and efficient O(n/sup 2/) algorithm to solve the sequence pair evaluation problem. We also show that using a more sophisticated data structure, the algorithm can be implemented to run in O (n log log n) time. Both implementations of our algorithm are significantly faster than the previous O(n/sup 2/) graph-based algorithm. For example, we achieve 60 /spl times/ speedup over the previous algorithm when input size n = 128. As a result, we can examine a million sequence pairs within one minute for typical input size of placement problems. For all MCNC benchmark block-placement problems, we have obtained the best results ever reported in the literature (including those reported by algorithms based on O tree and B* tree) with significantly less runtime. For example, the best known result for ami49 (36.8 mm/sup 2/) was obtained by a B*-tree-based algorithm using 4752 s and we obtained a better result (36.5 mm/sup 2/) in 31 s.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: