Detailed studies of a new, complete Marl Slate core in South Yorkshire have provided information on isotopic (δ13C, δ18O, δ34S) and geochemical variations (trace elements and C/S ratio) which enable the formulation of a model for carbonate and sulphide precipitation in the Late Permian Zechstein Sea. Calcite and dolomite are intimately associated; the fine lamination, organic character and absence of benthos in the sediments are indicative of anoxic conditions. Lithologically the core can be divided into a lower, predominantly sapropelic Marl Slate (2 m) and an upper Transition Zone (0·65 m) of alternating sapropel and calcite‐rich and dolomite‐rich carbonates. C/S ratios are 2·22 for the Marl Slate and 1·72 for the Transition Zone respectively, both characteristic of anoxic environments. δ18O in the carbonates shows a large and systematic variation closely mirrored by variations in calcite/dolomite ratio. The results suggest a fractionation factor equivalent to a depletion of 3·8% for 18O and 1·5% for 13C in calcite. The δ34S values of pyrite are isotopically light (mean value = ‐ 32·7%) suggesting a fractionation factor for the Marl Slate of almost 44%, typical of anoxic basins. The results are related to stratification in the early Zechstein Sea. Calcite was precipitated in oxic upper layers above the halocline. Below the oxic/anoxic boundary framboidal pyrite was precipitated, resulting in lower sulphate concentration and elevated Mg/Ca ratio (due to calcite precipitation). As a result of this, dolomite formation occurred below the oxic/anoxic interface, within the anoxic water column and in bottom sediments. Variations in calcite/dolomite ratios, and isotopic variations, are thus explained by fluctuations in the relative level of the oxic/anoxic boundary in the Zechstein Sea.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sweeney et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: