Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SETTING: The bioavailability of rifampicin (RMP) decreases by ∼30% on interaction with isoniazid (INH) in stomach acid conditions, which can result in the development of drug resistance and treatment failure. OBJECTIVE: To compare the bioavailability in healthy volunteers of five anti-tuberculosis fixed-drug combinations (FDCs) used in China (formulations A-E) containing RMP and INH against single-drug formulations taken as reference. DESIGN: Two- or three-period, two- or three-sequence crossover study of drugs. RESULT: Only RMP formulation E passed the bioequivalence criteria, with 90% confidence intervals for the log-transformed ratios of AUC₀₋₂₄, AUC₀₋∞, and Cmax of respectively 89.9-103.7, 89.6-102.2 and 87.7-107.9. For INH, formulations A, B, C and D passed the bioequivalence test, but not product E, where the 90%CIs of the log-transformed ratios of AUC₀₋₂₄, AUC₀₋∞, and Cmax were respectively 85.2-100.7, 85.2-100.7 and 73.8-100.9. CONCLUSION: According to the results of the bioequivalence analysis carried out in this study, RMP formulations A, B, C and D were not within the acceptable range and only formulation E passed the bioequivalence criteria of 80-125%. In comparison, four-test INH formulations (A, B, C and D) were bioequivalent to the corresponding single-drug formulation, while product E failed in the bioequivalence criteria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hao et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: