Key result
Pulmonary rehabilitation programs of longer duration provide greater benefits, and exercise reduces mechanical disadvantage and oxidative stress in patients with COPD.
This review highlights 2005 literature showing that longer pulmonary rehabilitation programs and specific training techniques improve pulmonary mechanics and reduce oxidative stress in COPD.
Longer pulmonary rehabilitation programmes may yield greater benefits; leaves open optimal duration, adherence, and cost-effectiveness for routine adoption.
Educational aims To present innovative papers from the field of pulmonary rehabilitation published in 2005 and to discuss the important points and conclusions from each. Summary This paper summarises the findings of important papers that have been published over the last year. Two recently published studies have addressed the effects of different durations of pulmonary rehabilitation programme (PRP), indicating the greater benefits obtained by longer programmes. Three other papers have described the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation on pulmonary mechanics and oxidative stress, indicating that exercise is able to reduce the mechanical disadvantage of the respiratory system and some aspects of oxidative stress associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Other papers have discussed the effects of a number of breathing strategies, such as pursed-lip breathing (PLB), or training techniques, such as arm or inspiratory muscle training. Finally, the addition of drug therapy to pulmonary rehabilitation and the role of outcome measures in providing rehabilitation programmes were examined in two other studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ambrosino et al. (2006) conducted a review in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Pulmonary rehabilitation was evaluated. Pulmonary rehabilitation programs of longer duration provide greater benefits, and exercise reduces mechanical disadvantage and oxidative stress in patients with COPD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: