This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Current post-polypectomy surveillance strategies rely on morphological features and fail to capture the biological heterogeneity that underlies early colorectal neoplasia. While the SWI/SNF subunit ARID1A is frequently altered in colorectal cancer, its clinical utility and biological role during the pre-malignant stage remain unclear. We evaluated ARID1A protein expression via immunohistochemistry (IHC) in colorectal polyp tissue microarrays (TMAs, n=1184). To define the underlying biology, we integrated somatic mutation profiling, bulk RNA sequencing and multiplex immunofluorescence for immune context (CD3, CD8, FOXP3, and CD68). High ARID1A expression was independently associated with a significantly increased risk of metachronous lesions ( p <0.001), consistently stratifying patients otherwise classified as low risk by conventional criteria (e.g., single polyps). Somatic ARID1A mutations correlated with reduced protein expression ( p <0.001), supporting a genetic basis for these divergent phenotypes. Transcriptomic profiling revealed that high-ARID1A polyps were driven by Myc- target pathways, high cell proliferation, transcriptional activation and a pronounced regenerative stem-cell signature, alongside increased FOXP3+ regulatory T-cell infiltration. Conversely, ARID1A-low lesions were characterised by transcriptional repression, cell- differentiation pathways, and increased CD8+ T-cell infiltration. Tissue ARID1A expression captures the underlying pathogenic heterogeneity in pre-malignant colorectal disease, linking distinct genomic, transcriptomic and immune profiles directly to clinical behaviour. Assessing ARID1A status provides a powerful, biologically informed framework for improving post-polypectomy risk stratification beyond conventional clinicopathological criteria.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ammar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: