Key result
NOACs show no difference in thromboembolism or bleeding for AF with bioprosthetic valves.
Why the study?
It is unknown whether the risk of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation patients with bioprosthetic valves differs from that in patients without such valves, and the safety and efficacy of NOACs in this population is unclear.
Does NOAC therapy reduce thromboembolic and bleeding outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients with bioprosthetic heart valves?
Does NOAC therapy reduce thromboembolic and bleeding outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients with bioprosthetic heart valves?
Current limited evidence suggests NOACs have similar thromboembolic and bleeding outcomes in AF patients with bioprosthetic valves, though more definitive studies are needed.
Similar outcomes with NOACs in AF and bioprosthetic valves; leaves open confirmation in dedicated RCTs.
INTRODUCTION: The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which include dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban, are preferred over vitamin K antagonists for stoke prevention in most patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The NOACs are contraindicated in atrial fibrillation patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis or mechanical heart valves. There is evidence that bioprosthetic heart valves are less thrombogenic than mechanical heart valves, but it is unknown whether the risk of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation patients with bioprosthetic valves differs from that in patients without such valves. AREAS COVERED: The authors present a review of the efficacy and safety evidence surrounding the use of NOACs for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients with bioprosthetic heart valves. EXPERT COMMENTARY: While the data is limited, there is no significant difference in thromboembolic, and bleeding outcomes in patients with AF and bioprosthetic heart valves treated with NOAC therapy. Future studies are required before definitive conclusions can be drawn regarding the safety and efficacy of NOAC therapy in AF patients bioprosthetic heart valves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrade et al. (2018) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation with bioprosthetic heart valves. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) was evaluated on Thromboembolic and bleeding outcomes. NOAC therapy showed no significant difference in thromboembolic and bleeding outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and bioprosthetic heart valves.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: