Key result
Smartphone-activated volunteer responders linked to ~7-fold higher bystander defibrillation in residential cardiac arrests.
Why the study?
The association between the arrival of smartphone-activated volunteer responders before EMS and bystander defibrillation in OHCA at home and public locations was unclear.
Does the arrival of smartphone-activated volunteer responders before EMS improve bystander defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?
Observational (n=1,271)
Yes
Does the arrival of smartphone-activated volunteer responders before EMS improve bystander defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?
The arrival of smartphone-activated volunteer responders before EMS significantly increases the likelihood of bystander defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in both private homes and public locations.
Volunteer responder arrival before EMS was associated with higher bystander defibrillation; extends observational support for smartphone dispatch systems in OHCA.
AIMS: To investigate the association between the arrival of smartphone-activated volunteer responders before the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and bystander defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) at home and public locations. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective study (1 September 2017-14 May 2019) from the Stockholm Region of Sweden and the Capital Region of Denmark. We included 1271 OHCAs, of which 1029 (81.0%) occurred in private homes and 242 (19.0%) in public locations. The main outcome was bystander defibrillation. At least one volunteer responder arrived before EMS in 381 (37.0%) of OHCAs at home and 84 (34.7%) in public. More patients received bystander defibrillation when a volunteer responder arrived before EMS at home (15.5 vs. 2.2%, P < 0.001) and in public locations (32.1 vs. 19.6%, P = 0.030). Similar results were found among the 361 patients with an initial shockable heart rhythm (52.7 vs. 11.5%, P < 0.001 at home and 60.0 vs. 37.8%, P = 0.025 in public). The standardized probability of receiving bystander defibrillation increased with longer EMS response times in private homes. The 30-day survival was not significantly higher when volunteer responders arrived before EMS (9.2 vs. 7.7% in private homes, P = 0.41; and 40.5 vs. 35.4% in public locations, P = 0.44). CONCLUSION: Bystander defibrillation was significantly more common in private homes and public locations when a volunteer responder arrived before the EMS. The standardized probability of bystander defibrillation increased with longer EMS response times in private homes. Our findings support the activation of volunteer responders and suggest that volunteer responders could increase bystander defibrillation, particularly in private homes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andelius et al. (2022) conducted an observational in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (n=1,271). Arrival of smartphone-activated volunteer responders before EMS vs. EMS arrival before volunteer responders was evaluated on bystander defibrillation (p=<0.001). Arrival of smartphone-activated volunteer responders before EMS was associated with higher bystander defibrillation rates in private homes (15.5% vs 2.2%) and public locations (32.1% vs 19.6%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: