Key result
RT-PCR was a highly sensitive (93%) and specific (92%) alternative to virus isolation for the detection of turkey coronavirus in experimentally infected turkeys.
Why the study?
Does RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry accurately detect turkey coronavirus compared to virus isolation in experimentally infected turkeys?
Does RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry accurately detect turkey coronavirus compared to virus isolation in experimentally infected turkeys?
RT-PCR is a highly sensitive and specific alternative to conventional diagnostic procedures for detecting turkey coronavirus.
New assays detect TCV in experimental samples; leaves open field validation and routine diagnostic adoption.
A reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) procedure and two monoclonal antibody (MAb)-based immunohistochemical procedures were developed for detection of turkey coronavirus (TCV) in tissues and intestinal contents/dropping samples. The RT-PCR, MAb-based fluorescent antibody (FA), and MAb-based immunoperoxidase (IP) procedures were compared with virus isolation (VI) for detection of TCV in experimentally infected turkeys. TCV was detected in experimentally infected turkeys as early as day 1 postexposure (PE) by each of the four detection procedures. TCV was detected as late as day 35 PE by FA or IP and days 42 and 49 PE by VI and RT-PCR, respectively. With VI as a reference, sensitivity and specificity of RT-PCR were 93% and 92%, respectively; specificity of both FA and IP was 96%, and sensitivities were 69% and 61%, respectively. Each of the examined procedures was highly specific, but the RT-PCR procedure was also highly sensitive. These findings demonstrate the utility of both immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR for detection of TCV. In addition, the findings indicate that RT-PCR is a highly sensitive and specific alternative to conventional diagnostic procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Breslin et al. (2000) studied Turkey coronavirus (TCV) infection. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) vs. Virus isolation (VI) was evaluated on Sensitivity and specificity for detection of TCV. RT-PCR was a highly sensitive (93%) and specific (92%) alternative to virus isolation for the detection of turkey coronavirus in experimentally infected turkeys.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: