Research Article| July 01, 2001 A Suggestion for Fitting Ground-motion Attenuation near an Extended Earthquake Source D. J. Andrews D. J. Andrews U.S. Geological Survey 345 Middlefield Road MS 977 Menlo Park, CA 94025 jandrews@usgs.gov Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information D. J. Andrews U.S. Geological Survey 345 Middlefield Road MS 977 Menlo Park, CA 94025 jandrews@usgs.gov Publisher: Seismological Society of America First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Online Issn: 1938-2057 Print Issn: 0895-0695 © 2001 by the Seismological Society of America Seismological Research Letters (2001) 72 (4): 454–461. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.72.4.454 Article history First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation D. J. Andrews; A Suggestion for Fitting Ground-motion Attenuation near an Extended Earthquake Source. Seismological Research Letters 2001;; 72 (4): 454–461. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.72.4.454 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietySeismological Research Letters Search Advanced Search Peak accelerations recorded near the causative faults of recent large earthquakes have been smaller than expected from published attenuation relations (Somerville, 2000; Anderson et al., 2000). This discrepancy provides a motivation to find new empirical fits of peak ground motion to functional forms that account for the extended nature of the source at locations near the fault (Ohno et al., 1993; Ambraseys and Srbulov, 1998). It has long been proposed (Housner, 1965; Brune, 1970; Hanks and Johnson, 1976) that peak acceleration and short-period velocity spectral response approach constant values at... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D. J. Andrews (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: