These findings contribute to conclusively clarifying why, S. pyogenes isolates with the M phenotype, the tetracycline- ones are, as a rule, SmaI typeable, while the -susceptible ones are not. Previous studies have that, while the two related genetic elements (Tn1207.3 10394.4) typical of tetracycline-susceptible isolates are into the same prophage, the tet(O)-mef(A) element of tetracycline-resistant isolates is inserted into a different (6). The present results show that the R-M encoding, in Tn1207.3-10394.4, the methyltransferase for DNA resistance to cleavage by SmaI is in the tet(O)-mef(A) element where, together with an ORF, it is replaced by three new ORFs flanked, both and downstream, by homologous regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bacciaglia et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: