Key result
Review outlines current evidence on managing MINOCA from coronary vasospasm or microvascular dysfunction.
Why the study?
MINOCA caused by coronary vasospasm or microcirculation dysfunction has variable outcomes and requires further diagnostic tests for accurate cause identification and management.
This review highlights the importance of advanced diagnostic testing to identify the exact cause of MINOCA, particularly vasospasm or microvascular dysfunction, to enable appropriate treatment and improve outcomes.
May inform evaluation of MINOCA subtypes; leaves open optimal therapies pending prospective trials.
Myocardial Infarction (MI) with Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) is a syndrome with underlying many causes. MINOCA incidence is estimated to be between 5% and 25% of all MI. The outcome is extremely variable depending on the MINOCA cause. Clinical history, laboratory tests, echocardiography and coronary angiography are the first line diagnostic investigations. Nevertheless, further tests are frequently necessary (e.g. optical coherence tomography, invasive provocative test with acetylcholine or cardiac magnetic resonance) to establish the exact cause, and allowing the adequate risk stratification and management. This is crucial since many patients, particularly those with angiographically normal coronary arteries, are often labelled as 'noncardiac', therefore missing the chance for appropriate treatment. And this group of patients characterizes substantially worse outcome than previously it was believed. Here, we have reviewed the pathogenesis, diagnosis, prognosis, and management of MINOCA caused by coronary vasospasm or coronary microcirculation dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bil et al. (2018) conducted a review in Myocardial Infarction with Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA). This review summarizes the pathogenesis, diagnosis, prognosis, and management of MINOCA caused by coronary vasospasm or coronary microcirculation dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: