Small‐scale modeling was performed to examine the effects of the superposition of two successive extensional phases from orthogonal to oblique (type 1) and from oblique to orthogonal (type 2). In both the type 1 and type 2 models, faults produced during the first stage strongly control fault development during the second stage. In type 1 models, the oblique faults developed during the second oblique phase are confined within a first‐phase graben, whereas in type 2 models the oblique faults, produced during the first phase, continue to develop during orthogonal extension and connect with each other to give sigmoidal fault blocks. Type 1 models are compared with the structural setting of the Ethiopian Rift; the evolution of the rift is related to a recent extensional event, whose principal direction of stretching trends at around 50° to preexisting major normal faults. Type 1 laboratory models are fairly comparable to the northern sector of the Ethiopian Rift, referred to here as MER. They account for both the development of the en echelon oblique faults of the Wonji Fault Belt and the sinistral shear gradient running parallel to the eastern border of the MER, which formed during an oblique rifting extension. The statistical analysis of the whole Ethiopian Rift fault pattern by reference to the experimental data allows the determination of a N100°–N110° mean direction of stretching.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bonini et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: