Electronic spectra of “giant tetrahedral” decaruthenium cluster anions are consistent with a HOMO−LUMO gap of ≤1.2 eV, with intense transitions assigned to M−M* → CO 2π* at high energy and weak transitions assigned to M−CO π → M−CO σ* at low energy; the former are relatively insensitive to increasing phosphine substitution or cluster core charge, whereas the latter show some ligand dependence. The first diffuse reflectance UV-vis-NIR spectra of metal carbonyl clusters have been obtained; spectra of [Ru 2 (μ-H)(μ-NC 5 H 4 ) 2 (CO) 4 (NC 5 H 5 ) 2 ][Ru 10 (μ-H)(μ 6 -C)(CO) 23 (PPh 3 )] and [ppn] 2 [Ru 10 (μ 6 -C)(CO) 24 ] contain broad absorptions extending to a λ onset of 1300 nm with absorption maxima corresponding to those of the solution spectra superimposed. Local density functional (LDF) calculations support the optical spectra assignments and predict a triply degenerate HOMO approximately 1.3 eV below the LUMO. Magnetic susceptibility data for [Ru 2 (μ-H)(μ-NC 5 H 4 ) 2 (CO) 4 (NC 5 H 5 ) 2 ][Ru 10 (μ-H)(μ 6 -C)(CO) 23 (PPh 3 )] show a temperature independent susceptibility χ m of +1384 ± 10 × 10 -6 cm 3 mol -1 (diamagnetic correction including decaruthenium valence electrons), arising from Van Vleck paramagnetism; unlike related decaosmium clusters and lower nuclearity ruthenium clusters, no temperature dependent component of the susceptibility exists. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) investigations on three decaruthenium cluster anions reveal a temperature-independent paramagnetic (TIP) signal which does not derive from solid-state packing effects, the nature of the cation, the presence of impurities such as colloids, particles, or oxides, or incipient metallic character (“mesometallic” behavior); this EPR signal, the first reported TIP resonance from a carbonyl cluster, is assigned to the presence of radical decaruthenium clusters due to oxidation of the cluster anions. Unlike high-nuclearity clusters examined previously by EPR, no temperature-dependent response was found for [Ru 2 (μ-H)(μ-NC 5 H 4 ) 2 (CO) 4 (NC 5 H 5 ) 2 ][Ru 10 (μ-H)(μ 6 -C)(CO) 24 ]. The electronic spectroscopy, magnetic susceptibility data, EPR studies, and LDF calculations are consistent with these high-nuclearity carbonyl clusters having “molecular” rather than “mesometallic” character.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cifuentes et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: