The reaction of [Ir(η5-C5Me5)I{PO(OMe)2}{P(OH)(OMe)2}] with pyrazole (Hpz) in the presence of AgPF6 gave [Ir(η5-C5Me5){PO(OMe)2}{P(OH)(OMe)2}(Hpz)]PF61. Deprotonation of 1 with sodium carbonate afforded the neutral compound [Ir(η5-C5Me5){PO(OMe)2}2(Hpz)]2 which, in turn, can be deprotonated to [(η5-C5Me5)Ir{PO(OMe)2}2(pz)M′](M′= Tl 3 or Na 4) by Tl(acac)(acac = acetylacetonate) or NaH, respectively. The complex [Ir(η5-C5Me5)I2{P(OH)(OMe)2}]5, prepared by cleaving the iodide bridges in [{Ir(η5-C5Me5)I}2(µ-I)2] with HPO(OMe)2, reacted with Hpz in the presence of AgPF6 to give [Ir(η5-C5Me5){PO(OMe)2}(Hpz)2]PF66. Complexes of formulae [(η5-C5Me5)Ir{PO(OMe)2}2(pz)M″L2][M″L2= Rh(CO)27, Rh(cod)8 or Ir(cod)9] were prepared from 2 and [Rh(acac)(CO)2] or from 3′ and the appropriate [{M″(cod)}2(µ-Cl)2] dimer (cod = cycloocta-1,5-diene). Complex 6 reacted with [{Rh(cod)}2(µ-Cl)2] in basic medium to give [(η5-C5Me5)Ir{PO(OMe)2}(pz)2Rh(cod)]10. The rhodium–thallium compound [(η5-C5Me5)Rh{PO(OMe)2(pz)Tl] or the in situ prepared sodium derivative [(η5-C5Me5)Rh{PO(OMe)2}(pz)2Na] reacted with the dimers [{M″(diolefin)}2(µ-Cl)2] affording [(η5-C5Me5)Rh{PO(OMe)2}2(pz)M″(diolefin)][M″(diolefin)= Ir(cod)11 or Rh(nbd)12] or [(η5-C5Me5){PO(OMe)2}Rh(pz)2M″(diolefin)][M″(diolefin)= Rh(cod)13, Ir(cod)14 or Rh(nbd)15], respectively (nbd = bicyclo[2.2.1]hepta-2,5-diene). Related heterovalent complexes of general formula [I(η5-C5Me5)M{PO(OMe)2}2M″(diolefin)][M = Ir, M′(diolefin)= Rh(cod)16 or Ir(cod)17; M = Rh, M″(diolefin)= Rh(cod)18, Ir(cod)19, or Rh(nbd)20] have been prepared starting from the mononuclear complexes [M(η5-C5Me5I{PO(OMe)2}{P(OH)(OMe)2}](M = Ir or Rh). All the complexes have been characterized by spectroscopic means and the fluxional behaviour of 7–9, 11 and 12, in solution, has been studied. The protonation of 8 by toluene-p-sulfonic acid is reported. The structures of 8 and 16 have been determined by X-ray diffraction methods. Both complexes consist of doubly bridged binuclear (C5Me5)Ir–Rh(cod) species, where the Ir atoms exhibit pseudo-octahedral coordination and the rhodium square planar. The bridging system in 16 is formed by two identical P,O-bonded phosphonate groups, while in 8 a pyrazolate and a phosphonate ligand are bridging the metals. The intermetallic separations are 4.0445(9)(8) and 4.0928(9)Å(16).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valderrama et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: