Key result
Simulated pharmacogenomic-guided warfarin dosing improves time in therapeutic range by ~4% over standard care.
Why the study?
The clinical utility of pharmacogenomic-guided warfarin dosing using CYP2C9 and VKORC1 variants in addition to clinical data is unclear due to few comparative trials.
Does pharmacogenomic-guided warfarin dosing improve time in therapeutic range compared to standard of care in simulated patients?
Does pharmacogenomic-guided warfarin dosing improve time in therapeutic range compared to standard of care in simulated patients?
Clinical trial simulation suggests pharmacogenomic-guided warfarin dosing may modestly improve time in therapeutic range, especially in settings with less intensive follow-up or when adjusting for slower response in CYP2C9 variant patients.
OBJECTIVE: Variants of two genes, CYP2C9 and VKORC1, explain approximately one third of variability in warfarin maintenance dose requirements. However, the clinical utility of using this information in addition to clinical and demographic data ('pharmacogenomic-guidance') is unclear, as few comparative clinical trials have been conducted to date. The objective of this study was to explore the incremental effect of pharmacogenomic-guided warfarin dosing under various conditions using clinical trial simulation. METHODS: We used an existing pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to perform clinical trial simulations of pharmacogenomic-guided versus standard of care warfarin therapy. The primary outcome was the percentage of patient time spent in therapeutic range over the first month of therapy. We assessed the influence of the frequency of INR monitoring, and the use of a loading dose and dose increase delay in patients with CYP2C9 variants. RESULTS: Pharmacogenomic guidance resulted in a 3-4 percentage point absolute increase in time spent in therapeutic range over the first month of therapy compared with standard of care. The improvement in time in range was greater when the frequency of INR monitoring in both arms was assumed to be lower. The absolute difference increased to 6-8 percentage points with the use of a loading dose and dose increase delay in patients with a CYP2C9 variant. CONCLUSION: Our initial results imply that pharmacogenomic-guided warfarin dosing may be more useful in settings with less intensive patient follow-up, and when adjustments are made for slower therapeutic response in patients with a CYP2C9 variant. Further pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model development may be useful for warfarin pharmacogenomic trial design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salinger et al. (2009) studied Warfarin therapy. Pharmacogenomic-guided warfarin dosing vs. Standard of care warfarin therapy was evaluated on Percentage of patient time spent in therapeutic range over the first month of therapy (3-4 percentage point absolute increase). Simulated pharmacogenomic-guided warfarin dosing resulted in a 3-4 percentage point absolute increase in time spent in therapeutic range over the first month compared with standard of care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: